There's something amusing about carrying on a conversation via your father with AIM, as he tools off toward another state for a couple days.
There's something altogether terrifying about him ending that conversation with "Out!", as if he's some sort of hip to the jive lingo yo dude.
A thin line is somewhere between dry humor and seriousness, and with some people (like my dad) you can never tell which side they're on...
While suffering through immense boredom this rainy afternoon, I stopped off at the iTunes Music Store and picked up Richard Cheese's "Lounge Against the Machine" album.
There's just something day-brightening about listening to "Closer" rendered as a lounge tune, replete with xylophones. It probably doesn't hurt that Cheese sounds so happy as he calls out the lyrics. But that's nothing compared to the rethinking of "Rape Me."
Good fun.
Two new iPods were announced today. iPod Photo: Cool. iPod U2 Special Edition: Ugly as sin.
The iPod photo is spifftastic. Color screen, 15 hours of music playback, connect to a TV or use the iPod's screen for slideshows... Good stuff. 60 gigabytes, too. Mmm. Nothing in that list I need, but it's fun to drool over.
U2 edition, not so much. In fact, I think it's rather hideous. Bright red scrollwheel and dark black body. Beautiful. If you're blind. Plus it comes preloaded with U2 music which, as my brother pointed out, sounds more and more the same.
Note to self: you aren't crazy. There is an ImageCapture API. It's part of Carbon. SDK with sample code and documentation is here. Throw TWAIN out the window. It sucks.
I don't generally eat at McDonald's, as I've been of the opinion for years that their food sucks. Their fries have always been good, and their shakes are tasty, but the bizzarely spongy burgers just ain't right.
With the new ad campaign for their chicken selects, I figured I'd give them a shot today for lunch.
Bad.
While the Chicken Selects look tasty enough, the texture is a lot like the burgers: not at all right for what it's supposed to be. Rather than chewing anything like chicken, it's more like something too soft and too nondescript. To their credit, it was all white, though "meat" may be pushing the limits of truth in advertising.
The dipping sauces were pretty sad too. Not being a barbecue sauce fan, and having ranch at home, I asked for honey mustard. My first bite, I thought "this doesn't taste like honey or mustard." My second bite, I pondered, tasted more like sugar than either of the halves of the equation. A quick look at the ingredients list confirmed my suspicions: the first two ingredients (and thus the most common) are water and sugar.
My shake was tasty enough, though. Thick and chocolatey and a reminder of years of my childhood.
After the Qwest debacle, I expected some sort of response. If the operations people wanted to be stupid, they could have responded and told me I was full of shit (which would have pushed all the wrong buttons). Really, though, I expected at least a retraction of the far too nebulous "abuse warning." While an apology for the inconvenience and unsubstantiated conclusion-jumping would be super, I certainly wasn't and am not expecting one. Companies like Qwest don't care enough to apologize.
But apparently companies like Qwest don't even care enough to acknowledge that (a) they got my message and (b) were aware of the facts presented in it.
I'm now waiting for more abuse letters, as in the course of getting my new router up and running I've gone through three more IPs. Given we already know Qwest apparently doesn't track who actually has their IPs at the time of an incident, I'm just waiting for complaints to roll in about one of the three I've had today.
If they're stupid enough to threaten my account again, they're going to get an earful. As it stands, they'll probably be getting a letter to their corporate office, as this (ignoring the issue and being entirely clueless) sure as hell is no way to run any sort of internet service. Really, it's no wonder they shipped the majority of their customers off to MSN. It's just a shame they didn't do the same for their VDSL customers.
I've got to stop browsing other people's Amazon wishlists. They only give me more ideas for my own gargantuan list, which has become an unruly three-page monstrosity cataloging dozens of things that have piqued my interest and need to be remembered for later. Like after winning the lottery later, when I can buy them all in one gigantic Amazon order which will require an entire UPS truck to itself.
Trinity has the gorgeous Rider-Waite tarot in hers, but moreover she's got the damn Holga camera kit. The Holga was safely out of sight and out of mind until I saw it in her list. Now it's bound to end up in my own wishlist and quite possibly on my Christmas list (which a handful of relations will begin bugging me for any moment now, and I haven't even started to think about).
Following my post last weekend about the banner-wielding protesters, I began wondering if it wasn't some sort of bizarre performance art. After all, they had the same style sign and what looked to be the same people as I saw months before protesting elsewhere in the EV.
I just drove by them on the way home. Today they're outside the assisted living home on Dobson Road, protesting Healing Hearts. Clipping by at full speed, I didn't have time to catch the rest of the sign. The only Healing Hearts I could find a was ministry for parents who had abortions, so I doubt they're protesting a labor dispute today. Unless it's some really odd performance art.
Frankly, I'm fascinated with this as it marks the fourth time I've seen them making dissonant protests. I'd love to trek back over there and ask them what the hell's up, but I don't have the time. If you're reading this and want to check it out yourself, they're presently in Chandler, on Dobson Road between Ray Road and Chandler Boulevard. Can't miss 'em -- they're on the east side of the road, in front of an assisted living place, with a big banner.
Apparently I'm really slow, as I just discovered that a fair chunk of NetNewsWire's keyboard shortcuts don't really need the command key at all. Hit K, everything's marked read. Hit U, the selected headlines are marked unread. B opens in your browser.
I wish I had discovered this sooner, as it's a lot easier to use one finger than to do the old thumb-plus-random-finger stretch.
Update: Now that Brent Simmons, NetNewsWire's creator, has commented on this entry, I suppose I should mention it's no fault of his that I didn't know this. ;)
Rather, I had never explored the full gamut of NetNewsWire because I was quite satisfied with what I'd found in five minutes of playing around. Even when he's added and announced new features, I've generally ignored them. It's met my needs brilliantly with very little effort, and only with the addition of my iBook did I finally start to more fully explore NNW: touchpads are far less efficient than mousing, and there's a vast difference in the way I use my Power Mac and my iBook now (mouse-heavy with the occasional keyboard shortcut on one, keyboard-heavy with the occasional mouse use on the other).
Consider it glowing praise for Ranchero Software and NetNewsWire that it had features I didn't even realize I needed.
I'm flummoxed by the U2 iPod ads, namely the "Vertigo" song used therein.
Bono counts the song off as "uno, dos, tres, catorce" -- which is 1, 2, 3, 14.
Fourteen?
I even checked the lyrics, where it's listed as catorce. Weird.
But it gets odder: while the versions I'd heard on the radio thus far all had the 14 the ad version did, I heard a radio cut tonight that "corrected" it to 4 (cuatro). At first I thought the 14 was used on purpose, but after hearing it with a very distinct 4 this evening, I'm at a loss. Maybe Bono just really, really sucks at Spanish and nobody (?) caught it before the release.
Initial theories included Pi (3.14) and some 3:14 Bible passage, but I have yet to read anything corroborating theories of significance. And with the apparently edited version floating about, that theory's pretty much shot to hell.
I've resigned myself to everything going on sale or being updated shortly after my price protection window expires. You've just got to throw caution to the wind and buy, knowing life will mock you shortly thereafter (and you won't be able to find the receipt, even if you still qualify). It's the way it always works.
And it's no different with my iBook G4! Bought it September 3rd, and today Apple releases a whole new crop of speed-bumped iBooks for $100 less and with preinstalled wireless networking. That's... $50 + $69... $120 I could have stuffed back into the savings account to fund the digital SLR I'm going to need in a couple months.
Unlike some people, though, I just laugh it off. There's nothing else to do. Technology's constantly changing, and there is no winning against new product lineups. So many people I've worked with get angry when new products come out, as if they're in a keeping up with the Joneses competition with the manufacturer. Just because Apple bumped the speeds up 200 MHz doesn't suddenly make my iBook less useful (and really, 200MHz is fairly insignificant). Get a grip, people. Your computer/camera/car still serves you as well now as it did before. It's not like the company is going to send out Crippling Slowdown Rays!!! to make you buy a new computer.
On the other hand, obsessive buyers do tend to flood the eBay market shortly after an announcement like this, throwing supply and demand in favor of the buyer. So take advantage of your high-strung neighbors and pick yourself up a laptop on the cheap!
Nothing says love quite like a cat stuffing his paw up your nostril and then happily licking your nose whilst purring.
Political LazyWeb: If anyone can manage to get a copy of the Center for Arizona Policy's (http://www.azpolicy.org) "Voter's Guide 2004" and send it to my Gmail address (this blog's name, no spaces @ gmail.com), I'd rightly appreciate it. I've tried using several addresses with their braindead mandatory registration scheme and it barfs on every one of them, even those that are actual valid addresses.
I had to laugh yesterday as I drove past the gigantic Bank of America building in south Mesa. East Valley residents will recognize it as the building that glows with a blue outline at night, acting as a navigation beacon for many of us living here.
There on the sidewalk were three protestors with a big banner, dissatisfied with the behavior of a large national bank. "Shame on Wachovia Bank," it said, "Stop the labor dispute!"
Wachovia and Bank of America are two completely distinct entities. Though they're both based in Charlotte, North Carolina, they're not sister companies and in fact compete for business.
Apparently they realized this about the time I pointed and my brother started laughing, as they had starting dismantling their gigantic vinyl-and-PVC banner. Wachovia, in fact, doesn't maintain an Arizona presence. I'm not sure what braindead union sent those guys out to protest in Arizona, much less in front of the wrong damn bank. It made for a brief interjection of humor as my brother and I spent the next several miles pondering how you miss the gigantic "Bank of America" logo, and considering other companies to mis-protest.
These will return in a later topic, but just for the moment, three scenarios involving parents and technology.
Scene 1
A father and his child are in the Apple Store, walking down the software aisle.DAD: Is this for the Mac? I didn't think they made that for the Mac.
CHILD, SIGHING: We're in the Apple Store. Yes, that runs on the Mac. Everything here is for the Mac.
Scene 2
A FATHER receives a digital camera for his birthday. He's quite elated, and takes it with him on his trips in lieu of a traditional film camera. He learns how to store the pictures on his computer, and that since they've been copied, they can be safely deleted from the card to free up space. Some time later, the FATHER comes to his SON.FATHER: What store has the best prices on memory cards? I think I'm going to have to buy another one soon. This one is almost full.
Scene 3
A MOTHER works in the IT department of a large national company. At work, she has multiple computers of her own and a large network fileshare where her files are stored and she regularly finds other files she needs.At home, the MOTHER is worried that her Word documents will use up too much space, and that she'll never find them again on such a large drive. As a result, she stores all of her files on unlabeled floppy disks, and continues to do so even after one of the disks goes bad and destroys multiple important files.
I wandered around the Apple Store at Chandler Fashion Center for about an hour tonight, looking for anything that struck my fancy. Not finding anything that screamed "buy me!" that couldn't be rationalized away or dismissed by my plans to stick to a budget that will put a Canon Digital Rebel in my hands, I proudly left the store.
And promptly came home and bought music from the iTunes Music Store, having heard some good stuff on the store computers and then being entranced by the suggestions the music store made based on my cart.
As for the Apple Store: they were damn busy. Numerous Windows users were drawn in by the promise of the iMac G5 (yeah, so I eavesdrop -- err, I mean, "overhear!"), which I do believe now outnumbers every other system in the store. Part of the reason I stayed so long was in hopes of getting to play with one, but alas, the floor models were in such high demand I could never get near one.
I watched two or three of them go out the door in the time I was there, and several more were being prepared for later pickup by the Genius Bar employees.
And in case anyone's dying to know the current trends among 16-24 year old females, the green iPod mini is apparently "the cutest" and "so cool." Of the young women that stopped to look at the iPods in the 5 minutes or so I was in front of the iPod accessories, three -- none of them together -- commented positively in some fashion or another about the green mini. So apparently pastel green is the new black. I don't get it either, but there you have it. (Sex toy makers, start your engines vibrators in pastel green!)
Every corporate whore in the market is all over the iPod phenomenon. Among the iPod cases the Apple Store stocked: a napa leather case and an ass-ugly case branded with the DC Shoe Co (I'm sorry, DCSHOECOUSA, if you want to be pedantic) logo. When being a poseur hoping to effect the experienced skater vibe, apparently just overpriced crap shoes and caps are no longer enough. No, now you need the DC trifecta: shoes, hat, and iPod case. And don't forget your lip ring and jet black hair, which will fully initiate you into the soulless flock of sheep. Oh, wait, you're doing it to "be different" and "an individual." Right. Which is why you're wearing a studded belt and black socks like every other new kid on the block, right? Right.
Hmm. I think I went off on a tangent there somewhere, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Allow me to take this moment out of my day to proclaim my undying love for the Ben Stein/Al Franken Yahoo! ad. It's a nice break from the crappier television ads, particularly thanks to Franken's last line: "A lot of them get their trophy wives on Yahoo..."
Found at Trinity's, again. I feel a trend coming on.
Pet Peeves:
Favorite Sounds:
- Bad drivers
- People who say "axe" instead of "ask"
- Morons who shout into their cell phones
Favorite Candy:
- The wind through the trees
- Rain falling on the car roof
- Running water
Biggest Fears:
- Gobstoppers
- Bottle Caps
- Milky Way
Biggest Challenges:
- Dying
- Being stuck in a dead-end job
- Being trapped in the wilderness
Favorite Department Stores:
- Not kicking morons in the box and shoving them (thanks Avril)
- Maintaining organization
- Finding time to fit everything into my week
Most Used Words:
- Target
- JC Penney
- Sears
Favorite Pizza Toppings:
- Shit
- Fuck
- Really
Favorite Cartoon Characters:
- Pepperoni
- Mushrooms
- Onion
Movies Recently Watched:
- Bullwinkle
- Freakazoid
- Stimpy
Favorite Fruits:
- Donnie Darko
- Hedwig and the Angry Inch
- The Witness
Favorite Vegetables:
- Bananas
- Gala apples
- Grapes (white/green)
- Broccoli
- Mushrooms
- Lettuce
The White House blasted John Kerry Wednesday night for "outing" Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter as a lesbian during the third and final presidential debate. As if it were a secret. Fox debate panelist Mort Kondracke said Kerry's "outing" of Mary Cheney "struck me as a low blow designed to weaken the Bush-Cheney team with right-wingers who might not know that Dick Cheney has a lesbian daughter." Like it's a bad thing.Uh... Uh... But wait! The hilarity grows. Queer Day's take, again:
Lynne Cheney, Mary's mom, apparently didn't know Mary was a lesbian, either. She's very upset and says Kerry's remark was "tawdry." "The only thing I can conclude is he is not a good man," she told a crowd in Pittsburgh. We remain baffled.Someone let me know how the hell you "out" an openly gay woman. Please. Especially when -- gasp! -- Dick Cheney himself and John Edwards touched upon Mary's sexuality at the Vice Presidential debate last week. I'm flabbergasted. What rock do you have to be living under to not know Mary Cheney's a lesbian, especially after the whole debacle that ensued following Alan Keyes' rather stupid remarks (and the discovery that _his_ daughter, too, is a lesbian)?
I had a selection of babysitters through my childhood that can only be described as "interesting," so more of these little anecdotes may pop up over time.
But for now, just this one.
I had one babysitter who, upon occasion, babysat another child simultaneously. Another little boy. We got along famously, which was a nice break from some of the kids I hated. Some days we'd both have to sleep at the babysitter's house until our parents showed up.
This was all well and good, except she only had one spare bed.
Which, as little kids, doesn't matter. If there's room enough for two people and someone tells you to sleep in a bed, so be it. Especially since most of us probably shared beds in hotel rooms with brothers or sisters.
The babysitter, however, was obsessed. Two little boys sleeping in the same bed would apparently lead to wild boy-on-boy sex or homosexuality or something, and she was always adamant we not sleep like normal people. Rather, we had to sleep head-to-foot. So the foot of the bed had a pair of feet and a head while the head of the bed had a head and a pair of feet.
Granted, this sort of thing effectively precluded spooning and fucking, but it was nearly the perfect arrangement for uninhibited mutual oral sex.
Not that anything ever happened, mind you, because we were both far from puberty and sex is the last thing on your mind (and pointless, as ejaculation is years off).
I seriously don't know what was going through that babysitter's head or why she didn't consider all the sexy possibilities, but it always made for interesting nights. And makes for immense laughter all these years later as I look back on it. It's so completely insipid.
Shamelessly stolen borrowed from Trinity, it's "200 Things." Those items bolded are what I've done.
Because I'm still pissed off about yesterday's email from Qwest, let's review how exactly this came to pass.
1. Admittedly clueless user installs Norton Internet Security, a program which is, shall we say, alarmist at the least (Symantec couldn't make money if all their programs suggested everything was fine).
2. Admittedly clueless user reviews his NIS logs, finding IPs.
3. Admittedly clueless user admits he's clueless and puts the list of IPs -- and only a list of IPs -- into an e-mail to Qwest's abuse department. No timestamps, no datestamps, no information on what they did. Just a list of IPs. And a statement of what day these supposedly came from. "I can only assume it's bad," clueless user says in his message. [Yes, son, your report is awful, but those IPs showing up isn't necessarily bad.]
4. Apparently Qwest's network operations people also "can only assume it's bad" and don't have a clue about basic network administration or customer service, as they review it and freak out.
5. Qwest does not review their own DHCP records -- or doesn't keep any -- which would have immediately exonerated my account, as I didn't have a lease on that IP at the time. Qwest's IPs have fairly standard 90 minute leases.
6. Qwest sends me an email, including the email address, full name, and current IP of the person who reported the "abuse."
Now let's touch on why exactly so much of this is wrong.
Clueless User
Blindly following the word of a clueless customer is bad juju, folks. He even admits in his email that he doesn't have a clue. Why, then, do you break out the jackbooted thugs at the drop of a hat? What am I to do if I, like him, are a clueless user? How do I refute your claims, with which comes the threat of you canning my account the next time someone baselessly reports me as abusing the service and you don't so much as verify it?
Useless logs
Or rather, lack of logs. He didn't forward a firewall log of any sort -- there are no time or date stamps, no note of what port was attempted, or how many attempts were made. Simply "these were some IPs in my log." Qwest somehow turned this in to "MS RPC DCOM exploit," though I'm not entirely sure how. That's one hell of a logical leap from "no facts" to "RPC/DCOM." Most serious ISPs would laugh at you if you couldn't provide exact date and time stamps in addition to solid, factual information on what those IPs were doing.
Hell, those IPs could have shown up for any number of reasons. Maybe he was on a filesharing network. Or had File and Print Sharing turned on for his Internet NIC. Or he was on IRC, or instant messaging, or posted a link to files hosted on his computer... This would be how the internet works. A machine with one IP contacts a machine at another, for any one of a variety of reasons. If your firewall for any reason doesn't think this is right, it stops it and logs it. "Blocked" doesn't mean "attack."
No Logs or No Research
Qwest obviously didn't perform any research before throwing out their warning emails. This leads me to one of two possibilities: they don't log, or they don't care. If the latter, shame on them. If the former, shame on them. Let's assume for a moment they do log, however: they'd have right under their noses that fact that my machine hasn't had a lease for that IP in months. Per Qwest's own description, their IPs are dynamically assigned. Not to mention there's nothing stopping you from manually entering another, unused IP.
If you can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was indeed using that IP, you shouldn't accuse me. It's the basis of our legal system, not to mention common sense. Additionally, assuming their logic of "firewall log" to "RPC/DCOM holes" is correct, many of those attacks use forged source IPs, which means it sure as hell may not have come from me.
Equivalent logical leap and action: You're foaming at the mouth. Therefore you must have rabies. You don't know how you got rabies, therefore you must have been bitten by the neighbor's dog. Therefore, you go shoot the dog while your neighbor's at work. (Nevermind the Alka Seltzer tab in your mouth.)
Customer Hostile
Being customer-hostile does not earn you brand loyalty. I could just as soon find another ISP. I could go to satellite, or cable, or possibly find another DSL provider.
Bad business. Not that anyone has cared about good business since Qwest swallowed up USWest whole.
Violated Their Privacy Policy
According to Qwest's privacy policy, they'll never release your information to a third party -- including fun stuff like your full name.
What's in my mailbox? The reporting customer's full name, e-mail address, and IP address (which includes... Dun! Dun! Dun! his location).
Good job protecting that customer information there, folks! It makes me proud to know you're living up to your corporate goals. Were I the reporter, I could almost certainly sue you for breach, but alas, I'm only the person the charges were levied against.
The Bottom Line
I can't knock Qwest for the speed of the connection, although they could certainly increase it. Their customer service and network administration skills, however, are sorely lacking. In fact, they're the worst I've seen through five ISPs.
PSInet was pretty awful, and nobody at Earthlink could ever answer a question, but neither company ran around like a headless chicken, accusing and threatening their customers willy-nilly. This is certainly the end of my recommending Qwest's Choice Online VDSL to people who can't get ADSL. I simply can't in good conscience recommend this to people who can't effectively defend themselves from Qwest's bogus, completely clueless claims.
The people running Qwest.net, by far, are the least capable administrators I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. Long ago and far away, I started with a little Oklahoma ISP gone national. They were awesome. The techs new their stuff, the admins knew their stuff, and they were friendly. They offered bleeding-edge services at the time. Webmail before most ISPs offered it, SSL toward the end of their life... they were on the ball.
And then there's Qwest. Dealing with Qwest.net makes it painfully obvious why Qwest sold off the majority of their customers to MSN -- they don't have a clue. I today received an abuse notice from Qwest. Authentic, having checked the headers myself.
In it, they claim I've violated their AUP once by attempting to gain unauthorized access to a system. If it happens again, they say, the account may be terminated.
Except there are many holes in their logic. For starters, the claimed IP wasn't even leased to me until, oh, Saturday while the person reporting the "abuse" says it occurred in late September. Not to mention the possibility the IPs in question were spoofed, or the sender made it up completely. Further, I'm always leery of Average Joes reporting abuse. Hell, the person making the report went so far as to say all he knew was that Norton Internet Security reported these IPs and it must be something bad.
Oh, but it gets better. So much better. The reported issue? That my system is infected with a Windows virus. Which is all well and good except I'm not running Windows. The IP in question is currently leased to my Mac. Even if it was hooked up to my other system (which would have a different IP -- not one reported in the email), that runs Linux and would be similarly invulnerable to the exploit in question.
Sure, that sounds bad, but allow me to go on for a moment. Qwest included the abuse mail in its entirety. Including every IP the originator reported, and full headers. Sure, they modified out the sender's from address, but they left his IP and what looks like it may well be his Qwest username.
But what really peeves me is that basic network logging would show I didn't have possession of the IP at the time the abuse was reported.
Add this on top of the lack of webmail, the lack of SSL for POP or SMTP, and the fact that the account administration site is impossibly dense, and it's not a pretty experience.
If you've considering Qwest Choice Online -- their affordable, high-speed VDSL offering -- consider carefully if you can stand to deal with apparent incompetence. While I have the knowledge to hopefully sort this out, it would completely baffle most people (and they wouldn't stand a chance of defending themselves from the Almighty Qwest Acceptable Use Policy).
Update: Upon further examination of the e-mail, I discovered something wholly incomprehensible and unacceptable: the e-mail address of the person reporting the "abuse" is in my notification. The original email is tacked on to the report, you see, and it was due to my mail reader's settings that it wasn't appearing. Upon turning off an option, there in plain view was the originator's Qwest.net email address. Remind me never to report abuse to Qwest.
Hell, at this rate I could report the reporter for "abuse" in return for reporting me, and subscribe him to all the hardcore porn newsletters in the land. Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant, Qwest. Pardon me while I go hit their privacy policy.
A while back, I learned of Richard Cheese from Sly of Your Mac Life. I had forgotten all about him, and sadly never checked out his music, until I accidentally ran across his album in the iTunes Music Store.
After previewing the whole thing, I can say Lounge Against the Machine is one of the funniest, coolest albums I've encountered in a long time. To take 16 alt-rock standards and rock them lounge-style is just too cool.
I'm not normally a fan of cover albums, but how could I not love this one?
A fond farewell to actor Christopher Reeve, who died this evening.
No further details have yet been released, but his family is to release a statement tomorrow.
Nearly as indestructible as Superman himself, Reeve was astounding both in his drive to regain his life and pushing for the research that could help countless people suffering spinal injuries.
This bugs me every time someone confuses the two (and it does the public no favors), so let's clear this up.
Forward slash: / (or "slash")
Backslash: \
\: Backslash
/: Forward slash (or "slash")
Example Use
Read aloud the URL fragment www.apple.com/ibook/.
Answer: W W W dot apple dot com slash ibook.
Alternate answer: W W W dot apple dot com forward-slash ibook.
WRONG: W W W dot apple dot com backslash ibook.
So how the hell do I remember this?
Think of the slash as a person facing right. The bottom is its feet. The backslash (\) is thus leaning backward. The slash (/) leans forward. Got it? Good. Now stop messing them up, particularly those of you in broadcast journalism.
Taking a course in understanding photographs, one of the points hammered into your head over and over is that of veracity -- the truthfulness of the photograph. Given I am a photographer, and I've exposed every single one of my images myself, I'd long assumed I knew the veracity of my photographs. I assumed they were, in fact, a true representation of the world.
Then I went digital.
But I didn't realize until yesterday -- when I bought a new printer -- that I was perpetuating lies in my prints.
It's then I realized that printing the truth was about the only thing the Epson Stylus Photo 925 wasn't doing. The first print out of the new printer (a Canon) disappointed me. It was blown out in an area the Epson had detail and the Epson had a beautiful purple in the background that the Canon printed as blue. Needless to say I wasn't happy with the results, especially for a brand-new printer.
That's when I looked up at the screen. The newly-printed image in my hand, from the Canon, was the spitting image of what was on screen. The rocks were blown out. The background was blue. Curious how the hell the Epson came up with details that simply didn't exist, I fired up Photoshop and made numerous futile attempts at achieving the same results. It simply wasn't possible -- there was no detail in the blown-out area to bring out, and that purple just wasn't there.
So what's the Epson doing? Beats the hell out of me. But now I can appreciate the new printer, knowing I'm not going completely insane and it's not, in fact, far worse than the one I've been using.
Took the Jeep in for service today, and it turns out the air conditioning system decided to fail spectacularly. Far from a simple leak, the service advisor told me they found it was leaking "everywhere" (which is probably why it stopped cooling suddenly rather than gradually). There was some initially worry -- mine as well as his, mine due to the frightening cost -- that the evaporator core was toasted. But after replacing all the seals, things seem to be well.
Great news. In part because it means I don't have to spend $800 and in larger part because it's still air conditioning weather in Phoenix (and the non-rubberized portions of the 101 are slowly making me deaf when I'm trucking with the windows down, I'm sure).